Australia was ranked 36 out of 145 countries with a score of .733 for equality. While education and life expectancy were ranked highly, Australia did poorly on political empowerment and in some areas of economic participation, reflective of the wage inequality for similar work. Perhaps more disturbing, is that over the past ten years Australia has been sliding down the global rankings on the Gender Gap Index, indicative of the progress made in other nations and the lack of progress in our own.
All About Women festival at the Sydney Opera House. The big names at the festival this year were Miranda July (filmmaker, writer and artist), Piper Kerman (of Orange is the New Black fame), and Anne-Marie Slaughter (former US Director of Policy Planning). Due to the overlapping sessions on the program, I could not see everything I wanted, so I elected to attend a series of speakers on a range of topics of interest to me.
Professor Emerita Raewyn Connell has spent a lifetime researching gender. I first came across her work many years ago when I was undertaking a Masters of Arts in Gender Studies and I read her seminal work, Masculinities. Connell argues that there is no crisis in masculinity, as frequently proclaimed in the media. Rather, there are a variety of forms of masculinity and ways of being men. For example, the shift from blue collar labour to the IT sector, has seen a different masculinity come to the forefront. Gender is relational, thus masculinity is described in reference to femininity.
Connell spoke about the wage gap and argued that there are cumulative effects of wage inequity. For example, women retire with significantly less superannuation than men (from lower pay and time out of the labour force) which has a huge impact as women have longer life expectancy.
The new world of work is changing the way people divide household labour. So much of Australian male identity is still wrapped up in notions of male as bread-winner, but this is changing as more men seek active involvement in childrearing activities. Here we need to be cautious of sexism creeping in, emasculating househusbands as "Mr Mom". She also spoke about poverty and the disengagement of young men in poorer neighbourhoods where there is high unemployment, lower education, and more social problems related to alcohol, drugs and violence. Where there is insecure employment, there is stress.
Eva Cox asked a question regarding systemic change. Connell spoke of the need for all people, men and women, to be involved in creating the future.
I really enjoyed this session. Connell is extremely knowledgable and conveys her message clearly and succinctly. I have tremendous admiration for her and it was wonderful to hear her speak in person again after so many years.
|Susan Goodwin (left) and Raewyn Connell (right)|
New Women, New Men, New Economy
Narelle Hooper and Rodin Genoff came across as too showy - laughing at their own jokes, encouraging the audience to give themselves a round of applause (ugh!) and introducing their family members.
Their argument seemed to consist of a few main points. There are new men out there - as evidenced through photos of Justin Trudeau and Benedict Cumberbatch - and new women. Hooper and Genoff have cracked the CODE of the new economy which consists of Creativity Openness Diversity and Equity. They spoke of research they had conducted and provided some statistics as evidence.
I had expected a greater degree of intellectual rigour from this session. Given the Pledge for Parity theme, I was hoping for a more analytical, political economy approach to issues of prosperity, equity and economic participation. Rather, it felt like a shameless book plug. In fact, I was so underwhelmed that I decided not to purchase their book despite my intentions to.
I think this session would have benefited from a third party moderator who interviewed Hooper and Genoff about the findings of their research. In fact this was the only session in the Festival that did not have a Chair, which I believe let the audience down and made it less professional than other sessions.
|Narelle Hooper and Rodin Genoff|
The Women We Love To Hate
Ruby Hamad, featuring historian Michelle Arrow, author Charlotte Wood and researcher Dr Emma Jane. With the recent 40th anniversary republishing of Anne Summers' feminist classic, Damned Whores and God's Police (1975), the panel began by reflecting on the dichotomy that women fall into one of two camps: damned whore or virtuous saint. The panel concluded that it is almost impossible to be in the latter group, so most women are in the damned whores camp.
The panel discussed how women cannot win in terms of sexuality and how women who are shame, silenced and rendered invisible. They cited examples like the public servant who was slut shamed by a federal minister, women in the military filmed during sex without consent, Diane Brimble, Monica Lewinsky, and so many more. Emma Jane argued that "slut shaming is a misnomer. It is shaming for being a woman and having any kind of sexuality."
read review), in which ten 'fallen' women are held in captivity and humiliated for their involvement in some sort of sex scandal. Wood's women are 'bewildered by the simultaneous toxic desire and disgust' by their captors.
Emma Jane made an interesting point about women shrinking - how women sit and pose to make themselves as small as possible, whereas men spread out in a power posture. Her research on cyberbullying has revealed a shocking degree of misogyny, particularly for women in the gamer community.
The panel discussed various women that have been the subject of loathing. Former Prime Minister Julia Gillard was targeted by people within and outside of politics and eventually stood up to the misogyny in her famous speech. Michelle Arrow spoke about Lindy Chamberlain and how she was judged for failing to behave in line with societal expectations. The panelists agreed that small acts of courage - standing up for yourself and others - will make a significant difference.
This was a terrific hour of discussion - thought-provoking, humourous, and positive. After the session I met Charlotte Wood and she signed a copy of her book for me.
|(l-r) Ruby Hamad, Michelle Arrow, Charlotte Wood, Emma Jane|
True Crime vs Real Crime
My final session of the day was an interesting panel of crime writers. The amazing Van Badham chaired the panel which featured South African novelist Margie Orford, Mexican writer and President of Pen International Jennifer Clement, and Australian professor Kerry Carrington.
Van Badham pointed out that the volume of crime novels published and sold have continued to grow, the popularity of crime shows on television and the movies continue, two of the biggest successes in recent months are Serial and Making a Murderer - and yet, in most places, crime is actually decreasing. The panel spoke about the mistaken glamourising of gangsters and the criminal underbelly.
Kerry Carrington pointed out that 'upcharging' is on the rise - wherein criminalisation and punishment for minor offences is increasing, putting more women into the corrections system. Around 18% of women in jail are for drug related offences. Most women in jail have been impacted by domestic violence, alcoholism and mental health issues that, if prevented or treated, would have changed these women's lives dramatically.
Orford also pointed out that Scandinavian societies are more egalitarian, with women and men more on par than other parts of the world. The crime fiction coming from Scandinavia, however, is extremely violent particularly towards women. Steig Larsson's Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (Millennium series) and Henning Mankell's Kurt Wallander novels, are but two examples.
disappearance and brutal murders of young women in Juarez, for which the word femicide has been created. She wrote her book, Prayers for the Stolen, about young girls in Mexico against the backdrop of drug cartels, disappearances, and poverty. Mexico has a high rate of child sex trafficking, with little action by police. A theft of a car would generate more attention than the theft of a child.
Leigh Leigh, a 14 year old girl, and the police investigation and court case that followed. She spoke about how she and her family were targeted by the Police Integrity Commission following publication of her book.
The panel were asked a number of interesting questions, including one about media portrayals of women who commit crimes (like Aileen Wuornos, Karla Homolka). Female killers are often depicted as either victims themselves or crazy, but rarely as acting with agency.
This was an interesting, intellectual hour of thought-provoking discussion. I really didn't know much about the speakers before I attended, but was thoroughly impressed by their knowledge, passion and integrity. An excellent session.
|(l-r) Van Badham, Margie Orford, Jennifer Clement, Kerry Carrington|
Of course, no trip to a festival like this would be complete without the purchase of a few books. I picked up copies of:
- Jennifer Clement's Prayers for the Stolen, which she kindly signed for me.
- Anne Marie Slaughter's Unfinished Business
- Tara Moss's The Fictional Woman
There were plenty of other books that I wanted to get but I had to be selective (especially with the Sydney Writers Festival coming up soon). But I must say that I miss having Gleebooks at the All About Women and Festival of Dangerous Ideas. Current bookseller Kinokinuya is a wonderful bookstore, but I find that Gleebooks is more thoughtful in the selection of titles it brings to festivals. I would have certainly purchased more had Gleebooks been there.
Overall, I enjoyed my day out at the All About Women Festival. I love the diversity of topics and the talented women presenting. The chairs of sessions are uniformly excellent (Julia Baird, Ruby Hamad, Van Badham, Jane Caro, Catherine Fox, Jennie Brokie etc) and bring to the event tremendous curiousity, wit and wisdom.
There are a few things that would have made my day more enjoyable. First, the timetable this year pitted all the high profile speakers against each other. Why have Piper Kerman, Anne-Marie Slaughter and Carrie Brownstein on in the same timeslot? Plus the overlapping of timeslots meant having to choose between sessions or missing out altogether. Often people had to leave sessions early to rush to their next session which was disruptive to speakers and attendees. A few more panel sessions would have been beneficial.
Another annoyance was sessions not starting on time. My first session of the day started at 11am. There was a massive queue at the doors, but they did not open until 10.55am, so people were not seated and the session did not start until well after 11am. This is disrespectful to the speakers and shortchanges the attendees who do not get their full hour - cutting short the amount of question time.
Finally, there were almost no men present. This is understandable due to the nature of the event, but disappointing in terms of furthering gender equality. Men need to hear and understand these issues. Maybe some kind of "bring a bloke" campaign is needed to encourage men to engage with feminism. Having said that, I must say how enjoyable it was to spend a day with hundreds of feminists talking about the issues that matter to us all. See you next year!
My post about the 2015 All About Women festival is available on this blog.